Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and splenectomy are more effective than endoscopic therapy for recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension.
He, Fu-Liang; Qi, Rui-Zhao; Zhang, Yue-Ning; Zhang, Ke; Zhu-Ge, Yu-Zheng; Wang, Min; Wang, Yu; Jia, Ji-Dong; Liu, Fu-Quan.
Afiliação
  • He FL; Department of Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
  • Qi RZ; Department of General Surgery, Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.
  • Zhang YN; Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
  • Zhang K; Department of General Surgery, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100102, China.
  • Zhu-Ge YZ; Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China.
  • Wang M; Department of Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
  • Jia JD; Department of Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
  • Liu FQ; Department of Interventional Therapy, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China. liufq_sjt@163.com.
World J Clin Cases ; 8(10): 1871-1877, 2020 May 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32518776
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), splenectomy plus esophagogastric devascularization (SED) and endoscopic therapy + non-selective ß-blockers (ET + NSBB) are widely applied in secondary prevention of recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. These different treatments, however, have not been compared in patients with idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH).

AIM:

To compare the outcomes of TIPS, SED and ET + NSBB in the control of variceal rebleeding in patients with INCPH.

METHODS:

This retrospective study recruited patients from six centers across China. Demographic characteristics, baseline profiles and follow-up clinical outcomes were collected. Post-procedural clinical outcomes, including incidence of rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and mortality rates, were compared in the different groups.

RESULTS:

In total, 81 patients were recruited, with 28 receiving TIPS, 26 SED, and 27 ET + NSBB. No significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics were found among these three groups before the procedures. After treatment, blood ammonia was significantly higher in the TIPS group; hemoglobin level and platelet count were significantly higher in the SED group (P < 0.01). Rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the ET + NSBB group (P < 0.01). Mortality was 3.6%, 3.8% and 14.8% in the TIPS, SED and ET + NSBB groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.082). Logistic regression analysis showed that mortality was significantly correlated with rebleeding, HE, portal thrombosis and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with INCPH, TIPS and SED were more effective in controlling rebleeding than ET + NSBB, but survival rates were not significantly different among the three groups. Mortality was significantly correlated with rebleeding, HE and PVT.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article