Optimal procedure-related hospitalization using clinical pathway protocols following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: The clinical pathway (CP) protocols simplified a systematic process from hospitalization to discharge, and were conducted to achieve standardization of the treatment process as well as improve outcomes. Thus, we investigated the optimal procedure-related hospitalization period following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by comparing the rate of delayed bleeding (DB) and perforation according to CP protocols. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 630 patients who underwent ESD for gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer (EGC); Group A (368 patients) followed Protocol A for a hospital stay of a single night; Group B (262 patients) followed Protocol B for a hospital stay of two nights. RESULTS: The patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for pathologic diagnosis (42.1% in Group A vs. 32.1% in Group B for EGC). DB occurred in 21 patients, and there was no significant difference in the overall DB rates between Group A (12/368 = 3.3%) and Group B (9/262 = 3.4%) (P = 0.904). The DB rates were 2.5% (8/315) and 7.5% (4/53) in Group A, and 2.7% (6/223) and 7.7% (3/39) in Group B, without and with the use of antiplatelets, respectively, and 33.3% (1/3) in Group A and 50.0% (1/2) in Group B with the use of dual antiplatelets. DB developed at various intervals post-discharge from 2 to 17 days, and was successfully controlled by endoscopic hemostasis in most cases. There were no deaths or surgeries required as a result of uncontrolled DB and no postoperative delayed perforation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The CP protocols with a one-night hospitalization following gastric ESD decreased the hospital stay and did not influence postoperative complications compared to those with two-night hospitalizations.