Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies.
Koren, Michael J; Jones, Peter H; Robinson, Jennifer G; Sullivan, David; Cho, Leslie; Hucko, Thomas; Lopez, J Antonio G; Fleishman, Alex N; Somaratne, Ransi; Stroes, Erik.
Afiliação
  • Koren MJ; Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research, 4085 University Blvd. South, Suite 1, Jacksonville, FL, 32216, USA. mkoren@encoredocs.com.
  • Jones PH; Baylor College of Medicine, 6655 Travis St., Suite 320, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Robinson JG; University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Dr, Iowa City, IA, 52246, USA.
  • Sullivan D; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 50 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
  • Cho L; Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Desk JB1, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Hucko T; Amgen Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  • Lopez JAG; Amgen Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  • Fleishman AN; Amgen Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  • Somaratne R; Amgen Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  • Stroes E; Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam-Zuidoost, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cardiol Ther ; 9(2): 447-465, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32564340
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control on maximally tolerated statin or for those who are statin-intolerant. Ezetimibe and evolocumab improve CV outcomes when added to statins in high-CV-risk populations. The aim of the study was to compare evolocumab and ezetimibe for lipid-lowering efficacy and safety. METHODS: We summarized data from 1427 patients from three phase 3 evolocumab studies comparing double-blinded evolocumab vs. ezetimibe. These studies evaluated four distinct populations: those free of CVD receiving each agent as monotherapy, patients with CVD receiving add-on therapy to low- or high-intensity statin, and statin-intolerant patients. Lipid efficacy and safety were reported at week 12. RESULTS: Across the studies, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by a mean 55-61% from baseline to week 12; ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 18-20% from baseline (mean difference = 38-43% favoring evolocumab; p < 0.0001). This corresponded to absolute reductions in LDL-C of 60-104 mg/dL with evolocumab vs. 17-35 mg/dL with ezetimibe. Evolocumab also significantly improved other lipids and led to a higher percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals vs. ezetimibe. Adverse events and discontinuation rates (oral and parenteral therapy) were balanced across groups, suggesting good tolerance and acceptance of both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab outperformed ezetimibe in efficacy and lipid goal attainment. Both products demonstrated good safety/tolerability. These data may help guide access decisions for high-risk patients with inadequate treatment response or intolerance to statin therapy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article