Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic factors in patients with vulvar cancer: the VULCAN study.
Zapardiel, Ignacio; Iacoponi, Sara; Coronado, Pluvio J; Zalewski, Kamil; Chen, Frank; Fotopoulou, Christina; Dursun, Polat; Kotsopoulos, Ioannis C; Jach, Robert; Buda, Alessandro; Martinez-Serrano, Maria J; Grimm, Christoph; Fruscio, Robert; Garcia, Enrique; Sznurkowski, Jacek Jan; Ruiz, Cristina; Noya, Maria C; Barazi, Dib; Diez, Javier; Diaz De la Noval, Begoña; Bartusevicius, Arnoldas; De Iaco, Pierandrea; Otero, Maria; Diaz, Maria; Haidopoulos, Dimitrios; Franco, Silvia; Blecharz, Pawel; Zuñiga, Miguel A; Rubio, Patricia; Gardella, Barbara; Papatheodorou, Dimitrios C; Yildirim, Yusuf; Fargas, Francesc; Macuks, Ronalds.
Afiliação
  • Zapardiel I; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
  • Iacoponi S; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
  • Coronado PJ; Gynecology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos - IdISSC, Madrid, Spain pcoronadom@sego.es.
  • Zalewski K; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center - Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Chen F; Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fotopoulou C; Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Dursun P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kotsopoulos IC; Gynecological Oncology Department, Theagenio Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Jach R; Gynecology Department, University Hospital, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
  • Buda A; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Lombardia, Italy.
  • Martinez-Serrano MJ; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institut d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Grimm C; Division of General Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Fruscio R; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Lombardia, Italy.
  • Garcia E; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Sznurkowski JJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Ruiz C; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Noya MC; Gynecology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Barazi D; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Ciudad Sanitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Diez J; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital de Cruces, Vizcaya, Spain.
  • Diaz De la Noval B; Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain.
  • Bartusevicius A; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • De Iaco P; Gynecology Department, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
  • Otero M; Gynecology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Leon, Leon, Spain.
  • Diaz M; Gynecology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain.
  • Haidopoulos D; Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Franco S; Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Blecharz P; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Krakow, Poland.
  • Zuñiga MA; Gynecology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Torrecardenas, Almeria, Spain.
  • Rubio P; Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Gardella B; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
  • Papatheodorou DC; Gynecology Department, Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Yildirim Y; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Ege Gynaecology Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Fargas F; Gynecology Department, Instituto Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Macuks R; Gynecologic Oncology Department, Riga East Clinical University Hospital Latvian Oncology Center, Riga, Latvia.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(9): 1285-1291, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571891
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival in patients with vulvar cancer.

METHODS:

This international, multicenter, retrospective study included 2453 patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer at 100 different institutions. Inclusion criteria were institutional review board approval from each collaborating center, pathologic diagnosis of invasive carcinoma of the vulva, and primary treatment performed at the participating center. Patients with intraepithelial neoplasia or primary treatment at non-participating centers were excluded. Global survival analysis and squamous cell histology subanalysis was performed.

RESULTS:

After excluding patients due to incomplete data entry, 1727 patients treated for vulvar cancer between January 2001 and December 2005 were registered for analysis (1535 squamous, 42 melanomas, 38 Paget's disease and 112 other histologic types). Melanomas had the worse prognosis (p=0.02). In squamous vulvar tumors, independent factors for increase in local recurrence of vulvar cancer were no prior radiotherapy (p<0.001) or chemotherapy (p=0.006), and for distant recurrence were the number of positive inguinal nodes (p=0.025), and not having undergone lymphadenectomy (p=0.03) or radiotherapy (p<0.001), with a HR of 1.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.21), 2.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 6.1), and 3.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 5.7), respectively. Number of positive nodes (p=0.008), FIGO stage (p<0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.001), tumor resection margins (p=0.045), and stromal invasion >5 mm (p=0.001) were correlated with poor overall survival, and large case volume (≥9 vs <9 cases per year) correlated with more favorable overall survival (p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Advanced patient age, number of positive inguinal lymph nodes, and lack of adjuvant treatment are significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse in patients with squamous cell vulvar cancer. Case volume per treating institution, FIGO stage, and stromal invasion appear to impact overall survival significantly. Future prospective trials are warranted to establish these prognostic factors for vulvar cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Vulvares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Vulvares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article