Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exenatide extended release in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without residual insulin production.
Herold, Kevan C; Reynolds, Jesse; Dziura, James; Baidal, David; Gaglia, Jason; Gitelman, Stephen E; Gottlieb, Peter A; Marks, Jennifer; Philipson, Louis H; Pop-Busui, Rodica; Weinstock, Ruth S.
Afiliação
  • Herold KC; Departments of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Reynolds J; Internal Medicine (Endocrinology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Dziura J; Biostatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Baidal D; Internal Medicine (Endocrinology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Gaglia J; Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Gitelman SE; Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Gottlieb PA; Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Marks J; Department of Pediatrics (Endocrinology), University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Philipson LH; Barbara Davis Diabetes Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz, Colorado.
  • Pop-Busui R; Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Weinstock RS; Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 22(11): 2045-2054, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32573927
AIMS: To test whether a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist would improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to determine whether the presence of residual beta cell function would affect the response. In addition, we sought to determine whether the drug would affect beta cell function. METHODS: We performed a randomized placebo-controlled trial of exenatide extended release (ER) in participants with T1D with and without detectable levels of C-peptide. Seventy-nine participants were randomized to exenatide ER 2 mcg weekly, or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of detectable C-peptide levels. The primary outcome was the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 24 weeks. Participants were followed for another 6 months off study drug. RESULTS: At week 24, the time of the primary outcome, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c level was 7.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.42, 8.10) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.0% (95% CI 7.64, 8.35) in the placebo group (P = 0.08). At week 12 the LS mean HbA1c levels were 7.71% (95% CI 7.37, 8.05) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.05% (95% CI 7.7, 8.4) in the placebo group (P = 0.01). The improvement at week 12 was driven mainly by those with detectable levels of C-peptide. Those treated with exenatide ER lost weight at 12 and 24 weeks compared to those treated with placebo (P <0.001 and P = 0.007). The total insulin dose was lower, but not when corrected for body weight, and was not affected by residual insulin production. Adverse events were more frequent with exenatide ER, but hypoglycaemia was not increased. CONCLUSION: Treatment with exenatide ER may have short-term benefits in some individuals with T1D who are overweight or who have detectable levels of C-peptide, but short-term improvements were not sustained.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article