Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of pulse oximetry and earlobe blood gas with CO-oximetry in children with sickle cell disease: a retrospective review.
Arigliani, Michele; Zheng, Sean; Ruiz, Gary; Chakravorty, Subarna; Bossley, Cara J; Rees, David; Gupta, Atul.
Afiliação
  • Arigliani M; Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Lung Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
  • Zheng S; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Ruiz G; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Chakravorty S; Department of Paediatric Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Bossley CJ; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Rees D; Department of Paediatric Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Gupta A; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 4(1): e000690, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32577536
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the agreement between pulse oximetry (SpO2) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured by CO-oximetry on arterialised earlobe blood gas (EBG) in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD). DESIGN AND

SETTING:

We retrospectively reviewed 39 simultaneous and paired SaO2 EBG and SpO2 measurements from 33 ambulatory patients with SCD (32 subjects with Haemoglobin SS and one with Haemoglobin Sß+, 52% male, mean±SD age 11.0±3.6, age range 5-18). Measurements were performed between 2012 and 2015 when participants were asymptomatic. Hypoxaemia was defined as SaO2 ≤93%. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of SpO2 as compared with EBG SaO2.

RESULTS:

The mean±SD SpO2 and SaO2 values in the same patients were, respectively, 93.6%±3.7% and 94.3%±2.9%. The bias SpO2-SaO2 was -0.7% (95% limits of agreement from -5.4% to 4.1%) and precision was 2.5%. In 9/39 (23%) cases, the difference in SpO2-SaO2 was greater than the expected error range ±2%, with SaO2 more often underestimated by SpO2 (6/9), especially at SpO2values ≤93%. Thirteen participants (33%) were hypoxaemic. The sensitivity of SpO2 for hypoxaemia was 100%, specificity 85% and positive predictive value 76%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pulse oximetry was inaccurate in almost a quarter of measurements in ambulatory paediatric patients with SCD, especially at SpO2values ≤93%. In these cases, oxygen saturation can be confirmed through EBG CO-oximetry, which is easier to perform and less painful than traditional arterial blood sampling.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article