Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The dermoscopic inverse approach significantly improves the accuracy of human readers for lentigo maligna diagnosis.
Lallas, Aimilios; Lallas, Konstantinos; Tschandl, Philipp; Kittler, Harald; Apalla, Zoe; Longo, Caterina; Argenziano, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Lallas A; First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: emlallas@gmail.com.
  • Lallas K; First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Tschandl P; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kittler H; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Apalla Z; Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Longo C; Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Argenziano G; Dermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(2): 381-389, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32592885
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A recently introduced dermoscopic method for the diagnosis of early lentigo maligna (LM) is based on the absence of prevalent patterns of pigmented actinic keratosis and solar lentigo/flat seborrheic keratosis. We term this the inverse approach.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether training on the inverse approach increases the diagnostic accuracy of readers compared to classic pattern analysis.

METHODS:

We used clinical and dermoscopic images of histopathologically diagnosed LMs, pigmented actinic keratoses, and solar lentigo/flat seborrheic keratoses. Participants in a dermoscopy masterclass classified the lesions at baseline and after training on pattern analysis and the inverse approach. We compared their diagnostic performance among the 3 timepoints and to that of a trained convolutional neural network.

RESULTS:

The mean sensitivity for LM without training was 51.5%; after training on pattern analysis, it increased to 56.7%; and after learning the inverse approach, it increased to 83.6%. The mean proportions of correct answers at the 3 timepoints were 62.1%, 65.5, and 78.5%. The percentages of readers outperforming the convolutional neural network were 6.4%, 15.4%, and 53.9%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS:

The experimental setting and the inclusion of histopathologically diagnosed lesions only.

CONCLUSIONS:

The inverse approach, added to the classic pattern analysis, significantly improves the sensitivity of human readers for early LM diagnosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pele / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Sarda Melanótica de Hutchinson / Dermoscopia / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pele / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Sarda Melanótica de Hutchinson / Dermoscopia / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article