Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Provider-In-Triage in a Safety-Net Hospital.
Shah, Rushabh; Leno, Richard; Sinert, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Shah R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
  • Leno R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
  • Sinert R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
J Emerg Med ; 59(3): 459-465, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32595053
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Increasing emergency department (ED) utilization has contributed to ED overcrowding, with longer ED length of stay (EDLOS) and more patients leaving without being seen (LWBS), and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Previous studies of provider in triage (PIT) have shown decreased LWBS, but variable improvements in EDLOS.

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated the impact of PIT implementation in an urban safety-net hospital on commonly reported ED throughput metrics.

METHODS:

This before-and-after study was performed at an academic urban safety hospital. We implemented a PIT team that screened ambulatory ED patients for early discharge or expedited workup. The PIT intervention was implemented 3 days a week from January through April 2019. As controls, we compared throughput metrics from when PIT was unavailable (Group 2) and from 1 year prior (Group 3).

RESULTS:

There were significantly (p < 0.001) lower rates of LWBS in Group 1 (4.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-5.8%) compared with 2 (7.3%, 95% CI 5.5-9.7%) and 3 (7.8%, 95% CI 6.9-9.0%). Door-to-doctor times were significantly (p < 0.001) lower for Group 1 (148 min, interquartile range [IQR] 88, 226 min) compared with 2 (187 min, IQR 95.5, 266 min) and 3 (215 min, IQR 131, 290 min). EDLOS was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter for Group 1 (337 min, IQR 215, 468 min) compared with 2 (385 min, IQR 271, 516 min) and 3 (413 min, IQR 299, 538 min).

CONCLUSIONS:

We found significantly lower LWBS rates, shorter EDLOS, and shorter door-to-doctor times after PIT implementation. Compared with previous studies in a variety of settings, we found that PIT significantly improved LWBS and all throughput metrics in a safety net setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / Provedores de Redes de Segurança Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / Provedores de Redes de Segurança Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article