Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of a 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser using a diffractive optical element vs. a nonablative 1550-nm erbium-glass laser for the treatment of facial acne scarring in Asian patients: a 17-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial.
Kwon, H H; Yang, S H; Cho, Y J; Shin, E; Choi, M; Bae, Y; Jung, J Y; Park, G-H.
Afiliação
  • Kwon HH; Oaro Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yang SH; Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Cho YJ; Oaro Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
  • Shin E; Department of Pathology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
  • Choi M; Department of Dermatology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • Bae Y; Department of Dermatology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
  • Jung JY; Oaro Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park GH; Department of Dermatology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(12): 2907-2913, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32603006
BACKGROUND: Novel picosecond lasers using a diffractive optical element (P-DOE) have been available for skin resurfacing with distinct mechanisms. However, there are limited data directly comparing P-DOE and conventional fractional lasers for the treatment of atrophic acne scarring. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet P-DOE and a non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) in the treatment of acne scarring. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial was performed. One randomly assigned half-side of each patient's face (n = 25) was treated with four consecutive sessions of P-DOE at 3-week intervals and the other side with NAFL, with subsequent follow-up for 8 weeks after the final sessions. The efficacy and safety of the two lasers were determined by the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'acné (Scale of Clinical Evaluation of Acne Scars; ECCA) grading scale, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and patients' reports at the final visit. Histologic analysis was also performed. RESULTS: The P-DOE-treated side achieved a significantly better improvement in acne appearance (ECCA per cent reduction: 55% vs. 42%) with less severe pain (4.3 vs. 5.6) (P < 0.05). The IGA score and subjective satisfaction were consistent with ECCA score results. Occurrences of treatment-related side-effects were also lower in the group treated with P-DOE (P < 0.05). Histologic analysis revealed elongation and increased density of neocollagen fibres, elastic fibres and mucin throughout the dermis from both sides. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NAFL, P-DOE afforded better clinical outcomes and fewer side-effects in the treatment of acne scarring in Asian patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acne Vulgar / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acne Vulgar / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article