Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with left ventricular assist device.
Zormpas, Christos; Eiringhaus, Jörg; Hillmann, Henrike A K; Hohmann, Stephan; Müller-Leisse, Johanna; Schmitto, Jan D; Veltmann, Christian; Duncker, David.
Afiliação
  • Zormpas C; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Eiringhaus J; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Hillmann HAK; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Hohmann S; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Müller-Leisse J; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Schmitto JD; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
  • Veltmann C; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
  • Duncker D; Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany. duncker.david@mh-hannover.de.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 60(2): 303-311, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613315
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) could be a promising alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD in patients with LVAD due to its reduced risk of infection. However, surface ECG is altered following LVAD implantation and, since S-ICD detection is based on surface ECG, S-ICD could be potentially affected. The aim of the present study was to analyze S-ICD eligibility in patients with LVAD.

METHODS:

Seventy-five patients implanted with an LVAD were included in this prospective single-center study. The ECG-based screening test and the automated screening test were performed in all patients.

RESULTS:

Fifty-five (73.3%) patients had either a positive ECG-based or automated screening test. Out of these, 28 (37.3%) patients were found eligible for S-ICD implantation with both screening tests performed. ECG-based screening test was positive in 50 (66.6%) patients; automated screening test was positive in 33 (44.0%) patients. Three ECG-based screening tests could not be evaluated due to artifacts. With the automated screening test, in 9 (12.0%) patients, the test yielded no result.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients implanted with an LVAD showed lower S-ICD eligibility rates compared with patients without LVAD. With an S-ICD eligibility rate of maximal 73.3%, S-ICD therapy may be a feasible option in these patients. Nevertheless, S-ICD implantation should be carefully weighed against potential device-device interference. Prospective studies regarding S-ICD eligibility before and after LVAD implantation are required to further elucidate the role of S-ICD therapy in this population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article