Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase III Randomized Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Radiotherapy + Cetuximab Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck: The INTERCEPTOR-GONO Study (NCT00999700).
Merlano, Marco Carlo; Denaro, Nerina; Vecchio, Stefania; Licitra, Lisa; Curcio, Paola; Benasso, Marco; Bagicalupo, Almalina; Numico, Gianmauro; Russi, Elvio; Corvo', Renzo; Bruzzi, Paolo.
Afiliação
  • Merlano MC; Medical Oncology, St. Croce & Carle University Teaching Hospital and ARCO Foundation, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Denaro N; Medical Oncology, St. Croce & Carle University Teaching Hospital and ARCO Foundation, Cuneo, Italy, nerinadenaro@hotmail.com.
  • Vecchio S; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino, IST National Cancer Institute and University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Licitra L; Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Curcio P; Trials Office, Medical Oncology, St. Croce & Carle University Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Benasso M; Medical Oncology, San Paolo General Hospital, Savona, Italy.
  • Bagicalupo A; Radiation Oncology, San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy.
  • Numico G; Medical Oncology, SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Russi E; Radiation Oncology, St. Croce & Carle University Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Corvo' R; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino, IST National Cancer Institute and University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Bruzzi P; Radiation Oncology, San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Oncology ; 98(11): 763-770, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32629446
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab and RT (IBRT) (Arm A) was compared to cisplatin/RT (CRT) (Arm B) in a randomized phase III study. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Naïve patients with stage III-IVa, histologically proven locally advanced head and neck cancer (LASCCHN) were eligible. Arm A (IBRT) 3 TPF induction followed by cetuximab-RT (equivalent daily dose 2 Gy up to 70 Gy); Arm B 3 cisplatin concurrent with the same RT scheduling. Due to slow accrual and incomplete data collection a futility analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

236/282 patients were evaluable. Therefore, no formal analyses can be made between the two arms. OS was 45.2/53.6 months in Arm A/B. Complete responses were achieved in 64% of patients in both arms. Neutropenia and skin toxicity were significantly worse in Arm A and body weight loss was significantly worse in Arm B. Compliance with the planned drug administration was higher in Arm B (p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION:

The study suggests that IBRT and CRT have similar efficacy, activity and toxicity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cetuximab / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cetuximab / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article