Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Average absorbed breast dose (2ABD): an easy radiation dose index for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Traino, Antonio C; Barca, Patrizio; Lamastra, Rocco; Tucciariello, Raffaele M; Sottocornola, Chiara; Marini, Carolina; Aringhieri, Giacomo; Caramella, Davide; Fantacci, Maria E.
Afiliação
  • Traino AC; U.O.Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma n.67, 56125, Pisa, Italy. c.traino@ao-pisa.toscana.it.
  • Barca P; U.O.Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma n.67, 56125, Pisa, Italy.
  • Lamastra R; Dipartimento di Fisica E.Fermi, Università di Pisa, L.go B.Pontecorvo n.3, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
  • Tucciariello RM; U.O.Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma n.67, 56125, Pisa, Italy.
  • Sottocornola C; Dipartimento di Fisica E.Fermi, Università di Pisa, L.go B.Pontecorvo n.3, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
  • Marini C; Dipartimento di Fisica E.Fermi, Università di Pisa, L.go B.Pontecorvo n.3, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
  • Aringhieri G; U.O.S.D. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud-Est, Ospedale San Donato, Via P. Nenni 20, 52100, Arezzo, Italy.
  • Caramella D; S.D.Radiologia Senologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma n.67, 56125, Pisa, Italy.
  • Fantacci ME; Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, Università di Pisa, Via Paradisa n.2, 56100, Pisa, Italy.
Eur Radiol Exp ; 4(1): 38, 2020 07 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632827
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To propose a practical and simple method to individually evaluate the average absorbed dose for digital breast tomosynthesis.

METHODS:

The method is based on the estimate of incident air kerma (ka,i) on the breast surface. An analytical model was developed to calculate the ka,i from the tube voltage, tube load, breast thickness, x-ray tube yield, and anode-filter combination. A homogeneous phantom was employed to simulate the breast in experimental measurements and to assess the dose-depth relationship. The ka,i values were employed to calculate the "average absorbed breast dose" (2ABD) index. Four mammographic units were used to develop and test our method under many conditions close to clinical settings. The average glandular dose (AGD) calculated following the method described by Dance et al., and the 2ABD computed through our method (i.e., from the exposure parameters) were compared in a number of conditions.

RESULTS:

A good agreement was obtained between the ka,i computed through our model and that measured under different clinical conditions discrepancies < 6% were found in all conditions. 2ABD matches with a good accuracy the AGD for a 100% glandular-breast the minimum, maximum, and mean differences were < 0.1%, 7%, and 2.4%, respectively; the discrepancies increase with decreasing breast glandularity.

CONCLUSIONS:

The proposed model, based on only few exposure parameters, represents a simple way to individually calculate an index, 2ABD, which can be interpreted as the average absorbed dose in a homogeneous phantom, approximating a 100% glandular breast. The method could be easily implemented in any mammographic device performing DBT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Mama / Mamografia Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Mama / Mamografia Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article