Applicability of 2 Dental Age Estimation Methods to Taiwanese Population.

The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of Demirjian and Willems dental age estimation methods on a population of 8- to 15-year-old Taiwanese children. A total of 799 digital panoramic radiographs (404 boys, 395 girls) of children aged from 8.00 to 15.99 years are evaluated. All panoramic films are assessed by 2 examiners using Demirjian and Willems methods. We randomly select 48 panoramic films to evaluate the reproducibility of dental age measurements. The intraobserver and interobserver Cohen's kappa values are 0.733 and 0.762, respectively.The difference between chronological age and dental age is calculated for each individual using both methods. The result shows that Demirjian method slightly overestimates the chronological age of children. The mean age difference is 0.12 years for boys (standard deviation [SD], 0.80) and 0.21 years for girls (SD, 0.95). Willems method slightly underestimates the chronological age of children. The mean age difference is -0.22 years for boys (SD, 0.80) and -0.12 years for girls (SD, 0.92).In conclusion, Demirjian and Willems methods are both accurate for assessing dental age in the Taiwan region of China. The mean age differences of both methods are within ±1 year, which is acceptable at forensic odontology level. However, although the discrepancy between chronological age and dental age is frequently observed between -0.5 and 0.5 years in both methods, there is no guarantee it will be accurate for any particular individual, further modifications to both methods are suggested.