Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Economic Evaluation after Adopting Contingent Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Trisomies in South Spain.
Sainz, José A; Torres, María R; Peral, Ignacio; Granell, Reyes; Vargas, Manuel; Carrasco, Pilar; Garcia-Mejido, José A; Santacruz, Belén; Gil, María M.
Afiliação
  • Sainz JA; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Valme, Seville, Spain, jsainz@us.es.
  • Torres MR; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain, jsainz@us.es.
  • Peral I; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
  • Granell R; Clinical Analysis Department, Hospital Universitario Valme, Seville, Spain.
  • Vargas M; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
  • Carrasco P; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Valme, Seville, Spain.
  • Garcia-Mejido JA; Genetics Unit, Clinical Analysis Department, Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
  • Santacruz B; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Valme, Seville, Spain.
  • Gil MM; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; : 1-8, 2020 Jul 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32659771
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Contingent cell-free (cf) DNA screening on the basis of the first-trimester combined test (FCT) results has emerged as a cost-effective strategy for screening of trisomy 21 (T21).

OBJECTIVES:

To assess performance, patients' uptake, and cost of contingent cfDNA screening and to compare them with those of the established FCT.

METHODS:

This is a prospective cohort study including all singleton pregnancies attending to their FCT for screening of T21 at 2 university hospitals in South Spain. When the FCT risk was ≥150, there were major fetal malformations, or the nuchal translucency was ≥3.5 mm, women were recommended invasive testing (IT); if the risk was between 150 and 1270, women were recommended cfDNA testing; and for risks bellow 1270, no further testing was recommended. Detection rate (DR), false-positive rate (FPR), patients' uptake, and associated costs were evaluated.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 10,541 women, including 46 T21 cases. DR of our contingent strategy was 89.1% (41/46) at 1.4% (146/10,541) FPR. Uptake of cfDNA testing was 91.2% (340/373), and overall IT rate was 2.0%. The total cost of our strategy was €1,462,895.7, similar to €1,446,525.7 had cfDNA testing not been available.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contingent cfDNA screening shows high DR, low IT rate, and high uptake at a similar cost than traditional screening.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article