Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Canine intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion into the systemic circulation is commonly through primary hepatic veins as assessed with CT angiography.
Plested, Mark J; Zwingenberger, Allison L; Brockman, Daniel J; Hecht, Silke; Secrest, Scott; Culp, William T N; Drees, Randi.
Afiliação
  • Plested MJ; Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Zwingenberger AL; Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
  • Brockman DJ; Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Hecht S; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Secrest S; Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, USA.
  • Culp WTN; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Drees R; Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, UK.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 61(5): 519-530, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663370
ABSTRACT
Congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS) in dogs are traditionally classified as right, left, or central divisional. There are few descriptive studies regarding the variation of IHPSS within these categories. This multicenter, analytical, cross-sectional study aimed to describe a large series of dogs with CT angiography (CTA) of IHPSS, hypothesizing that there would be variation to the existing classification. Ninety CTA studies were assessed for IHPSS type, insertion, and the relationship of the insertion to the primary hepatic veins. Ninety-two percent of IHPSS inserted into a primary hepatic vein (HV) or phrenic vein, 8% inserted directly into the ventral aspect of the intrahepatic caudal vena cava. The most common IHPSS type was a single right divisional (44%), including those inserting via the right lateral HV or the caudate HV. Left divisional IHPSS (33%) inserted into the left HV or left phrenic vein. Central divisional IHPSS (13%) inserted into the quadrate HV, central HV, dorsal right medial HV, or directly into the ventral aspect of the intrahepatic caudal vena cava. Multiple sites of insertion were seen in 9% of dogs. Within left, central, and right divisional types, further subclassifications can therefore commonly be defined based on the hepatic veins with which the shunting vessel communicates. Relating IHPSS morphology to the receiving primary HV could make IHPSS categorization more consistent and may influence the type and method of IHPSS attenuation recommended.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Cava Inferior / Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática / Cães / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada / Veias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Cava Inferior / Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática / Cães / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada / Veias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article