Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopy and central reading in inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials: achievements, challenges and future developments.
Gottlieb, Klaus; Daperno, Marco; Usiskin, Keith; Sands, Bruce E; Ahmad, Harris; Howden, Colin W; Karnes, William; Oh, Young S; Modesto, Irene; Marano, Colleen; Stidham, Ryan William; Reinisch, Walter.
Afiliação
  • Gottlieb K; Immunology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA klaus.gottlieb@lilly.com.
  • Daperno M; A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy.
  • Usiskin K; Immunology, Celgene Corp, Summit, New Jersey, USA.
  • Sands BE; Dr Henry D Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ahmad H; Immunoscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, New York, New York, USA.
  • Howden CW; Gastroenterology, Univ Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
  • Karnes W; Gastroenterology, UC Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Oh YS; Immunology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Modesto I; Inflammation & Immunology, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA.
  • Marano C; Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Stidham RW; Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Reinisch W; Department of Medicine IV, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gut ; 70(2): 418-426, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699100
ABSTRACT
Central reading, that is, independent, off-site, blinded review or reading of imaging endpoints, has been identified as a crucial component in the conduct and analysis of inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials. Central reading is the final step in a workflow that has many parts, all of which can be improved. Furthermore, the best reading algorithm and the most intensive central reader training cannot make up for deficiencies in the acquisition stage (clinical trial endoscopy) or improve on the limitations of the underlying score (outcome instrument). In this review, academic and industry experts review scoring systems, and propose a theoretical framework for central reading that predicts when improvements in statistical power, affecting trial size and chances of success, can be expected Multireader models can be conceptualised as statistical or non-statistical (social). Important organisational and operational factors, such as training and retraining of readers, optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy, video quality, optimal or at least acceptable read duration times and other quality control matters, are addressed as well. The theory and practice of central reading and the conduct of endoscopy in clinical trials are interdisciplinary topics that should be of interest to many, regulators, clinical trial experts, gastroenterology societies and those in the academic community who endeavour to develop new scoring systems using traditional and machine learning approaches.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article