Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is not known if genetic background, characteristics at diagnosis, physical and psychological well-being, and adherence to a gluten-free diet are comparable between patients with familial or sporadic celiac disease. These issues were investigated in a follow-up study. METHODS: Altogether 1064 patients were analyzed for celiac disease-associated serology, predisposing HLA-DQ, and non-HLA genotypes. Medical data were collected from patient records and supplementary interviews. Current symptoms and quality of life were further evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Psychological General Well-Being questionnaire (PGWB), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. RESULTS: Familial and sporadic groups differed (P < 0.001) in the reason for diagnosis and clinical presentation at diagnosis, familial patients being more often screen-detected (26% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and having less often gastrointestinal (49% vs. 69%) and severe symptoms (47% vs. 65%). The groups were comparable in terms of histological damage, frequency of malabsorption, comorbidities, childhood diagnoses, and short-term treatment response. At the time of the study, familial cases reported fewer symptoms (21% vs. 30%, P = 0.004) and lower prevalence of all (78% vs. 86%, P = 0.007), neurological (10% vs. 15%, P = 0.013), and dermatological (9% vs. 17%, P = 0.001) comorbidities. Dietary adherence and GSRS scores were comparable, but familial cases had better quality of life according to PGWB and SF-36. High-risk genotype HLA-DQ2.5/DQ2.5 was more frequent among familial cases, and four non-HLA SNPs were associated with familial celiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the greater proportion of high-risk genotypes, familial cases had milder symptoms at presentation than did sporadic cases. Worse experience of symptoms and poorer quality of life in sporadic disease indicate a need for intensified support.