Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vivo confocal microscopy: The role of comparative approach in patients with multiple atypical nevi.
Longhitano, Sabrina; Pampena, Riccardo; Guida, Stefania; De Pace, Barbara; Ciardo, Silvana; Chester, Johanna; Longo, Caterina; Farnetani, Francesca; Pellacani, Giovanni.
Afiliação
  • Longhitano S; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Pampena R; Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Guida S; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • De Pace B; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Ciardo S; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Chester J; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Longo C; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Farnetani F; Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Pellacani G; Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Exp Dermatol ; 29(10): 945-952, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748489
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) increases diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis when combined with dermoscopy. In patients with multiple atypical nevi, a comparative dermoscopic approach improves melanoma recognition and saves unnecessary excision. The performance of a comparative approach combining dermoscopy and RCM has not been yet investigated.

OBJECTIVE:

To validate a comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach according to melanoma diagnostic accuracy in patients with multiple atypical nevi.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients undergoing RCM examination for ≥3 atypical melanocytic lesions, assessed with a dermoscopic + RCM comparative approach in a real-life setting, from July 2012 to April 2018 at a single centre, were enrolled. Dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM morphologic approaches were retrospectively applied by evaluating revisited 7-point checklist, RCM and Delphi scores for each enrolled lesion. Comparative dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM approaches were subsequently used. For each approach, lesions were classified as non-suspicious (long-term follow-up) or suspicious (short-term follow-up or excision) and diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis was assessed.

RESULTS:

Diagnostic accuracy progressively increased comparing morphologic to comparative approaches, and comparing dermoscopic to dermoscopic + RCM approaches. The retrospective comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach revealed the largest area under the curve (0.84; 95%CI0.79-0.89; P < .001) and the lowest number needed to excise (5.7). Furthermore, this approach had the highest specificity (67.6%) and sensitivity (100%) levels, which were similar to those verified in the real-life setting. The main study limitations are the retrospective design and high-risk patient inclusion only.

CONCLUSIONS:

Comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach increases melanoma diagnostic accuracy, reducing unnecessary excision without missing melanomas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Melanoma / Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas / Nevo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Melanoma / Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas / Nevo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article