Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in severe male factor infertility.
Asoglu, Mehmet Resit; Celik, Cem; Serefoglu, Ege Can; Findikli, Necati; Bahceci, Mustafa.
Afiliação
  • Asoglu MR; Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reproduction Center Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: mresitasoglu@hotmail.com.
  • Celik C; Bahceci Umut Assisted Reproduction Center Istanbul, Turkey; Uskudar University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Serefoglu EC; Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reproduction Center Istanbul, Turkey; Biruni University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Findikli N; Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reproduction Center Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Bahceci M; Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reproduction Center Istanbul, Turkey.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(4): 595-603, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763130
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION Does the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) improve outcomes in couples with severe male factor infertility (SMFI)?

DESIGN:

This retrospective cohort study included SMFI cases that underwent blastocyst transfer with/without PGT-A. Inclusion criteria were SMFI (azoospermia and sperm count <1 million/ml), women aged 25-39 years, single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer, and no intracavitary pathologies. Patients were divided into PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups. The primary outcome was live birth rate (live birth of an infant after 24 weeks of gestation); secondary outcomes were implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULTS:

The study included 266 SMFI cases (90 and 176 in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups, respectively). Men and women in the PGT-A group were significantly older than those in the non-PGT-A group. The groups did not differ in terms of male factor categories, sperm collection methods or additional female factors. Live birth rates in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were 55.6% and 51.1%, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.98, P = 0.495). The implantation rates were 65.6% and 64.2%, respectively (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.62-1.80, P = 0.827). The clinical pregnancy rates were 62.2% and 58.0%, respectively (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-2.01, P = 0.502). The use of PGT-A was not an independent factor for live birth (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66-2.70, P = 0.421). Advanced age in women was the only independent factor associated with live birth (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of PGT-A does not seem to be an independent factor associated with live birth per transfer in couples with SMFI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação / Azoospermia / Infertilidade Masculina / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação / Azoospermia / Infertilidade Masculina / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article