Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychosocial interventions for violence exposed youth - A systematic review.
Lindert, Jutta; Jakubauskiene, Marija; Natan, Marta; Wehrwein, Annette; Bain, Paul; Schmahl, Christian; Kamenov, Kaloyan; Carta, Mauro; Cabello, Maria.
Afiliação
  • Lindert J; University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany; WRSC, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States. Electronic address: Jutta.Lindert@hs-emden-leer.de.
  • Jakubauskiene M; University of Vilnius, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Natan M; University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany.
  • Wehrwein A; University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany.
  • Bain P; Countway Library, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, United States.
  • Schmahl C; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kamenov K; Instituto de salud Carlos III, Centro de investigación biomédica en salud mental (CIBERSAM), Departamento de psiquiatría, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Carta M; Liaison Psychiatry Unit, University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Italy.
  • Cabello M; Countway Library, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, United States.
Child Abuse Negl ; 108: 104530, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805619
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Violence exposure (direct, indirect, individual, structural) affects youth mental health.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in addressing the sequelae of violence exposure on youth (15-24 years old) and evaluate whether moderating factors impact intervention effectiveness.

METHODS:

We systematically searched eight databases and reference lists to retrieve any studies of psychosocial interventions addressing mental health among youth aged 15-25 exposed to violence. We assessed study risk of bias using an adapted version of the Downs and Black's Risk of Bias Scale.

RESULTS:

We identified n = 3077 studies. Sixteen articles representing 14 studies met were included. The studies assessed direct and indirect individual violence exposure at least once. We pooled the data from the 14 studies and evaluated the effects. We estimated an average effect of r+ = 0.57 (RCTs 95 % CI 0.02-1.13; observational studies 95 % CI 0.27-86) with some heterogeneity (RCTs I2 = 78.03, longitudinal studies I2 = 82.93). The most effective interventions are Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and Exposure Therapy with an exposure focus. However, due to the small number of studies we are uncertain about benefits of interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

No study assessed structural violence. Therefore, studies are needed to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions for youth exposed to direct, indirect, individual and structural violence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Violência / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Violência / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article