Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current evidence between hospital volume and perioperative outcome: Prospective assessment of robotic radical prostatectomy safety profile in a regional center of medium annual caseload.
Ferrari, Matteo; Mazzola, Brunello; Roggero, Enrico; D'Antonio, Eugenia; Mestre, Ricardo Pereira; Porcu, Giovanni; Stoffel, Flavio; Renard, Julien.
Afiliação
  • Ferrari M; Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Mazzola B; Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Roggero E; Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • D'Antonio E; Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Mestre RP; Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Porcu G; Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Stoffel F; Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Renard J; Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 15(3): E153-E159, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807280
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We aimed to present the safety profile of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed in a single center of medium surgical volume since its introduction and identify predictors of postoperative complications.

METHODS:

We prospectively collected clinical data from 317 consecutive patients undergoing RARP between August 2011 and November 2019 in a medium-volume center. Surgical procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon. Complications were collected according to the Martin criteria for reporting and the Clavien-Dindo classification for rating. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed and compared with available literature.

RESULTS:

A total of 102 complications were observed in 96 (30.3%) patients and were minor in 84.4% of cases (Clavien grade 1 and 2). Transfusion rate was 1.3%. Complications of grade 4b or 5 did not occur. The most frequent complications were urinary retention (7.3%) and anastomotic leak (5.9%). At multivariate analysis, the nerve-sparing technique was an independent predictor of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

The study shows that a high safety profile may be achieved in a medium-volume hospital. The nerve-sparing technique was a predictor of complications. Further studies are needed to define the current relationship between surgical volume and perioperative outcome for RARP.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article