Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the priority among the roentgenogram measurements in acetabular dysplasia.
Sonekatsu, Mayumi; Sonohata, Motoki; Inoue, Takao; Honke, Hidefumi; Kitajima, Masaru; Kawano, Shunsuke; Taniguchi, Wataru; Fukui, Daisuke; Mawatari, Masaaki.
Afiliação
  • Sonekatsu M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 13030Saga University, Saga, Japan.
  • Sonohata M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 13301Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
  • Inoue T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 13030Saga University, Saga, Japan.
  • Honke H; Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, 13150Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
  • Kitajima M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka Kinen Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Kawano S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 13030Saga University, Saga, Japan.
  • Taniguchi W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, 13030Saga University, Saga, Japan.
  • Fukui D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 13301Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
  • Mawatari M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 13301Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 28(3): 2309499020950575, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840414
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There are many radiographic parameters to evaluate developmental dysplasia of the hip joint (DDH); however, the priority between the parameters is unclear. We evaluated the priority of radiographic parameters in DDH.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 82 consecutive patients aged above 85 years without hip osteoarthritis (OA; no osteoarthritis (NO) group), and 28 patients with early stage hip OA were set as the control group (OA group). We used the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to consider the priority of the following parameters acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp angle, acetabular head index (AHI), and acetabular depth ratio (ADR).

RESULTS:

The LDA of five different parameters revealed that the NO and OA groups could be almost distinguished with 83.6% accuracy (p < 0.0001, Wilks' lambda test). The standardized scoring coefficients were as follows ARO, -0.23; CE, -0.43; Sharp, -0.29; AHI, 0.97; and ADR, 0.11. The AHI was particularly noticeable in the NO group.

CONCLUSION:

Dissociation of the AHI in the OA group was significantly higher than that of the other parameters in the OA group compared to the parameters in the NO group. A small AHI may be a risk parameter for hip OA due to DDH.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiografia / Osteoartrite do Quadril / Luxação Congênita de Quadril / Luxação do Quadril / Articulação do Quadril / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiografia / Osteoartrite do Quadril / Luxação Congênita de Quadril / Luxação do Quadril / Articulação do Quadril / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article