Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Particle Size Distributions for Cellulose Nanocrystals Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy: An Interlaboratory Comparison.
Meija, Juris; Bushell, Michael; Couillard, Martin; Beck, Stephanie; Bonevich, John; Cui, Kai; Foster, Johan; Will, John; Fox, Douglas; Cho, Whirang; Heidelmann, Markus; Park, Byong Chon; Park, Yun Chang; Ren, Lingling; Xu, Li; Stefaniak, Aleksandr B; Knepp, Alycia K; Theissmann, Ralf; Purwin, Horst; Wang, Ziqiu; de Val, Natalia; Johnston, Linda J.
Afiliação
  • Meija J; National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada.
  • Bushell M; National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada.
  • Couillard M; National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada.
  • Beck S; FPInnovations, Pointe-Claire, Quebec H9R 3J9, Canada.
  • Bonevich J; Materials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
  • Cui K; National Research Council Canada, Nanotechnology Research Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M9, Canada.
  • Foster J; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
  • Will J; Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
  • Fox D; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
  • Cho W; Department of Chemistry, American University, Washington, District of Columbia 20016, United States.
  • Heidelmann M; Department of Chemistry, American University, Washington, District of Columbia 20016, United States.
  • Park BC; Interdisciplinary Center for Analytics on the Nanoscale, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.
  • Park YC; Center for Nanocharacterization, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea.
  • Ren L; Division of Measurement & Analysis, National Nanofab Center, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
  • Xu L; National Institute of Metrology, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Stefaniak AB; National Institute of Metrology, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Knepp AK; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
  • Theissmann R; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
  • Purwin H; KRONOS INTERNATIONAL Inc., Peschstrasse 5, 51373 Leverkusen, Germany.
  • Wang Z; KRONOS INTERNATIONAL Inc., Peschstrasse 5, 51373 Leverkusen, Germany.
  • de Val N; Electron Microscopy Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
  • Johnston LJ; Electron Microscopy Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Anal Chem ; 92(19): 13434-13442, 2020 10 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32865398
ABSTRACT
Particle size is a key parameter that must be measured to ensure reproducible production of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and to achieve reliable performance metrics for specific CNC applications. Nevertheless, size measurements for CNCs are challenging due to their broad size distribution, irregular rod-shaped particles, and propensity to aggregate and agglomerate. We report an interlaboratory comparison (ILC) that tests transmission electron microscopy (TEM) protocols for image acquisition and analysis. Samples of CNCs were prepared on TEM grids in a single laboratory, and detailed data acquisition and analysis protocols were provided to participants. CNCs were imaged and the size of individual particles was analyzed in 10 participating laboratories that represent a cross section of academic, industrial, and government laboratories with varying levels of experience with imaging CNCs. The data for each laboratory were fit to a skew normal distribution that accommodates the variability in central location and distribution width and asymmetries for the various datasets. Consensus values were obtained by modeling the variation between laboratories using a skew normal distribution. This approach gave consensus distributions with values for mean, standard deviation, and shape factor of 95.8, 38.2, and 6.3 nm for length and 7.7, 2.2, and 2.9 nm for width, respectively. Comparison of the degree of overlap between distributions for individual laboratories indicates that differences in imaging resolution contribute to the variation in measured widths. We conclude that the selection of individual CNCs for analysis and the variability in CNC agglomeration and staining are the main factors that lead to variations in measured length and width between laboratories.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article