Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stones: Surgical technique, outcomes and literature review.
Abdel Raheem, Ali; Alowidah, Ibrahim; Hagras, Ayman; Gameel, Tarek; Ghaith, Ahmed; Elghiaty, Ahmed; Althakafi, Sultan; Al-Mousa, Mohammed; Alturki, Mohammed.
Afiliação
  • Abdel Raheem A; Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alowidah I; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Hagras A; Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Gameel T; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Ghaith A; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Elghiaty A; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Althakafi S; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Al-Mousa M; Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alturki M; Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 14(2): 241-249, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875735
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LPU) for the treatment of large proximal ureteric stone. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis for patients with solitary impacted proximal ureteric stone ≥15 mm who underwent LPU from 2016 to 2019 was performed. Primary outcome was to estimate the stone-free rate (SFR). SFR was defined as absence of residual stones on postoperative computed tomography scan. Secondary outcome was to assess the perioperative outcomes, as well as to review literature data of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing LPU to other treatment options. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in our study. Mean stone size was 22.9 ± 5.8 mm and median follow-up was 14 months. Three patients had previous abdominal surgery, one patient had severe degree of scoliosis and six patients failed primary therapy. All stones were extracted successfully (SFR = 100%) without need of auxiliary treatments. Mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 86.6 ± 14.1 minutes. and 11.9 ± 14.7 mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery were reported. No major postoperative complications (≥grade 3) were reported. Mean length of hospital stay was 2 ± 0.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: For treatment of large ureteric stones, our study showed that LPU achieves 100% stone-free status. When performed by well-trained laparoscopic surgeons, it is safe and has no major perioperative complications. According to our results and literature data, when counseling patients with large impacted proximal ureteral stones, LPU should be advised as the procedure that has the higher SFR, lower auxiliary treatments, and comparable complication rates to other treatments.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Cálculos Ureterais / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Cálculos Ureterais / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article