Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of Long-Term Infections After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Surgery - Utility of Novel PADIT and PACE DRAP Scores.
Slawek-Szmyt, Sylwia; Araszkiewicz, Aleksander; Grygier, Marek; Szmyt, Krzysztof; Chmielewska-Michalak, Lidia; Seniuk, Wojciech; Wasniewski, Michal; Smukowski, Tomasz; Lesiak, Maciej; Mitkowski, Przemyslaw.
Afiliação
  • Slawek-Szmyt S; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Araszkiewicz A; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Grygier M; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Szmyt K; Department of General, Endocrine and Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Chmielewska-Michalak L; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Seniuk W; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Wasniewski M; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Smukowski T; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Lesiak M; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
  • Mitkowski P; 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences.
Circ J ; 84(10): 1754-1763, 2020 09 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32893235
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infections (CDI) are of increasing importance and involve substantial healthcare resources. This study aimed to evaluate potential CDI risk factors and the utility of the novel PADIT and PACE DRAP scores to predict CDI.Methods and 

Results:

The study group included 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) surgery. Patients' and procedural characteristics were collected. CDI occurrence was assessed during 1-year follow-up. Moreover, if periprocedural significant pocket hematoma (SPH) occurred, the maximal volume was calculated based on ultrasonographic measurements and ABC/2 formula. The overall incidence of CDI was 1.8%. In the multivariable regression analysis independent CDI risk factors were age >75 years (odds ratio [OR] 5.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-19.84), system upgrade procedure (OR 6.46; CI 1.94-21.44), procedure duration >1 h (OR 13.96; CI 4.40-44.25), presence of SPH (OR 4.95; CI 1.62-15.13) and reintervention within 1 month (OR 16.29; CI 3.14-84.50). The PACE DRAP score had higher discrimination of CDI incidence (area under curve [AUC] 0.72) as compared with the PADIT score (AUC 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified 5 independent risk factors of CDI development. Our study also showed that the PACE DRAP score was better able to identify patients at high risk of CDI than the PADIT score.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article