Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.
Gunn, Christine M; Maschke, Ariel; Paasche-Orlow, Michael K; Kressin, Nancy R; Schonberg, Mara A; Battaglia, Tracy A.
Afiliação
  • Gunn CM; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Christine.Gunn@bmc.org.
  • Maschke A; Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Christine.Gunn@bmc.org.
  • Paasche-Orlow MK; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kressin NR; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Schonberg MA; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Battaglia TA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(4): 938-945, 2021 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935318
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Limited health literacy is a driver of cancer disparities and associated with less participation in medical decisions. Mammography screening decisions are an exemplar of where health literacy may impact decision-making and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe informational needs and shared decision-making (SDM) experiences among women ages 40-54 who have limited health literacy and primary care providers (PCPs).

DESIGN:

Qualitative, in-depth interviews explored experiences with mammography counseling and SDM.

PARTICIPANTS:

Women ages 40-54 with limited health literacy and no history of breast cancer or mammogram in the prior 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a Boston academic, safety-net hospital. PCPs practicing at this site were eligible for PCP interviews.

APPROACH:

Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A set of deductive codes for each stakeholder group was developed based on literature and the interview guide. Inductive codes were generated during codebook development. Codes were compared within and across patient and PCP interviews to create themes relevant to mammography decision-making. KEY

RESULTS:

The average age of 25 interviewed patients was 46.5; 18 identified as black, 3 as Hispanic, 2 as non-Hispanic white, and 2 had no recorded race or ethnicity. Of 20 PCPs, 15 were female; 12 had practiced for >5 years. Patients described a lack of technical (appropriate tests and what they do) and process (what happens during a mammogram visit) knowledge, viewing these as necessary for decision-making. PCPs were reluctant to engage patients with limited health literacy in SDM due to time constraints and feared that increased information might confuse patients or deter them from having mammograms. Both groups felt pre-visit education would facilitate mammography-related SDM during clinical visits.

CONCLUSION:

Both patients and PCPs perceived a need for tools to relay technical and process knowledge about mammography prior to clinical encounters to address the scope of information that patients with limited health literacy desired.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Letramento em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Letramento em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article