Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Optimal Combination of Monochromatic and Metal Artifact Reconstruction Dual-energy CT to Evaluate Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty.
Kim, Jihwan; Park, Chankue; Jeong, Hee Seok; Song, You Seon; Lee, In Sook; Jung, Yunsub; Lee, Sang Min.
Afiliação
  • Kim J; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  • Park C; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: chankue.park@gmail.com.
  • Jeong HS; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  • Song YS; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee IS; Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung Y; Deputy General Manager, CT Research Team, GE Healthcare, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SM; Department of Orthopedic Sugery, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Radiol ; 132: 109254, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32956998
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the effects of gemstone spectral imaging-metal artifact reduction (GSI-MAR) on different dual-energy CT monochromatic images for patients with total knee replacement arthroplasty (TKRA) and to identify an appropriate protocol for clinical practice.

METHOD:

We enrolled 34 patients with TKRA. CT images were iteratively reconstructed with or without GSI-MAR at different energy levels (70, 95, 115, and 140 keV). Two radiologists evaluated the objective and subjective image qualities and MAR-related new artifacts at the femoral and tibial levels. For objective analysis, the mean CT number and image noise of the selected regions of interest in the bone and muscle were recorded. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of GSI-MAR, a structural similarity index (SSIM) was used. For subjective analysis, streak artifacts and diagnostic confidence in detecting periprosthetic complications were assessed. Objective and subjective indicators were compared among the image combinations.

RESULTS:

In the femoral component, 140 keV monochromatic energy images with GSI-MAR showed the lowest mean CT number, image noise, SSIM value, and streak artifacts, and the best diagnostic confidence. In the tibial component, the image noise differed significantly, but the SSIM and subjective indicators were similar among the image combinations. MAR-related new artifacts were noted in 14.7% of images, and all of them were observed in only the femoral component.

CONCLUSION:

GSI-MAR with higher-energy monochromatic images showed fewer metal artifacts and better visualization. We recommend 140 keV with GSI-MAR for improving image quality and 140 keV without GSI-MAR for identifying MAR-related new artifacts when evaluating TKRA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artefatos / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artefatos / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article