Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lived experience research as a resource for recovery: a mixed methods study.
Honey, Anne; Boydell, Katherine M; Coniglio, Francesca; Do, Trang Thuy; Dunn, Leonie; Gill, Katherine; Glover, Helen; Hines, Monique; Scanlan, Justin Newton; Tooth, Barbara.
Afiliação
  • Honey A; School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. anne.honey@sydney.edu.au.
  • Boydell KM; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Coniglio F; Mental Health Drug & Alcohol, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Do TT; School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Dunn L; St George and Sutherland Mental Health Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Gill K; Consumer-Led Research Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Glover H; Enlightened Consultants, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
  • Hines M; School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Scanlan JN; School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Tooth B; Upfront Leadership, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Psychiatry ; 20(1): 456, 2020 09 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32958045
BACKGROUND: Lived experience research is conducted by people who have experience of mental health issues and is therefore better placed than more traditional research to illuminate participants' experiences. Findings that focus on identifying enablers of recovery from a lived experience perspective have the potential to assist people in their recovery process. However, this lived experience research is often difficult to find, access and interpret. We co-produced user-friendly and engaging resources to disseminate findings from six lived experience research studies. This paper seeks to answer the research questions: a) Did exposure to lived experience research increase hopefulness for participants?; and b) How else did interacting with lived experience research resources influence participants' lives? METHODS: Thirty-eight participants were introduced to four resources of their choosing by peer workers over a four-week period. The helpfulness of resources was evaluated using mixed methods, including a quasi-experimental analysis of change in hope, an anonymous survey and in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Findings indicated that the resources promoted hope, but that increases in hopefulness may not be seen immediately. Other impacts include that the resources: encouraged helpful activities; provided a positive experience; increased valued knowledge; encouraged people to reflect on their journey and think constructively about mental health issues; helped people to feel less alone; and assisted people to explain their situation to others. CONCLUSIONS: The research suggests the potential usefulness of lived experience research resources, presented in user-friendly formats, in the lives of people who experience mental health issues and implies a need to nurture this type of research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Esperança Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Grupo Associado / Esperança Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article