Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of qualitative and quantitative cranial ultrasonographic markers in first-trimester screening for open spina bifida and other posterior brain defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mace, P; Mancini, J; Gorincour, G; Quarello, E.
Afiliação
  • Mace P; Institut méditerranéen d'imagerie médicale appliquée à la gynécologie, la grossesse et l'enfance IMAGE2, Marseille, France.
  • Mancini J; Unité de dépistage et de diagnostic prénatal, Hôpital Privé Marseille Beauregard, Marseille, France.
  • Gorincour G; Public Health Department (BIOSTIC), APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Hop Timone, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
  • Quarello E; Institut méditerranéen d'imagerie médicale appliquée à la gynécologie, la grossesse et l'enfance IMAGE2, Marseille, France.
BJOG ; 128(2): 354-365, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32966672
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The significant number of qualitative and quantitative ultrasound markers described for first-trimester screening of open spina bifida (OSB) and other posterior brain defects (oPBD) has resulted in their complex implementation and interpretation for a widespread screening and in a lack of consensus regarding diagnostic accuracy.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess and compare the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative cranial sonographic markers at 11-14 weeks of gestation for the detection of OSB and oPBD. SEARCH STRATEGY A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and COCHRANE from 2009 to April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative and/or qualitative ultrasound signs to predict OSB and oPBD were included. Cohort studies and case-control studies were also considered. DATA COLLECTION AND

ANALYSIS:

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The overall pooled estimate and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated for each subgroup (qualitative and quantitative assessment). MAIN

RESULTS:

Twenty-three studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for qualitative assessment were 76.5% and 99.6%, and for quantitative assessment were 84.5% and 96.3%, respectively; specificity for the qualitative ultrasound signs was significantly higher (P = 0.001). The overall sensitivity of cranial sonographic markers for the screening of oPBD was 76.7% and specificity was 97.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The qualitative approach demonstrated greater specificity, so this would appear to be more appropriate for daily screening, as a first-line tool, whereas the quantitative approach should be reserved for expert ultrasound. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT This study highlights the relevance of first-trimester qualitative ultrasound signs in the screening of open spina bifida.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Espinha Bífida Cística / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Doenças Fetais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Espinha Bífida Cística / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Doenças Fetais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article