Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial.
Hagen, Suzanne; Kearney, Rohna; Goodman, Kirsteen; Melone, Lynn; Elders, Andrew; Manoukian, Sarkis; Agur, Wael; Best, Catherine; Breeman, Suzanne; Dembinsky, Melanie; Dwyer, Lucy; Forrest, Mark; Graham, Margaret; Guerrero, Karen; Hemming, Christine; Khunda, Aethele; Mason, Helen; McClurg, Doreen; Norrie, John; Karachalia-Sandri, Anastasia; Thakar, Ranee; Bugge, Carol.
Afiliação
  • Hagen S; Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. S.hagen@gcu.ac.uk.
  • Kearney R; The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Goodman K; University Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Melone L; Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Elders A; Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Manoukian S; Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Agur W; Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Best C; NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.
  • Breeman S; School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Dembinsky M; NMAHP Research Unit, unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling, UK.
  • Dwyer L; Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Forrest M; Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Graham M; The Warrell Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Guerrero K; University Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Hemming C; Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Khunda A; Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representative, Dunlop, UK.
  • Mason H; Department of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • McClurg D; Aberdeen Maternity Hospital & Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Norrie J; South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Karachalia-Sandri A; Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Thakar R; Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Bugge C; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Trials ; 21(1): 837, 2020 Oct 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032644
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pelvic organ prolapse (or prolapse) is a common condition in women where the pelvic organs (bladder, bowel or womb) descend into the vagina and cause distressing symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Many women will use a vaginal pessary to treat their prolapse symptoms. Clinic-based care usually consists of having a pessary fitted in a primary or secondary care setting, and returning approximately every 6 months for healthcare professional review and pessary change. However, it is possible that women could remove, clean and re-insert their pessary themselves; this is called self-management. This trial aims to assess if self-management of a vaginal pessary is associated with better quality of life for women with prolapse when compared to clinic-based care.

METHODS:

This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in at least 17 UK centres. The intervention group will receive pessary self-management teaching, a self-management information leaflet, a follow-up phone call and access to a local telephone number for clinical support. The control group will receive the clinic-based pessary care which is standard at their centre. Demographic and medical history data will be collected from both groups at baseline. The primary outcome is condition-specific quality of life at 18 months' post-randomisation. Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed using participant-completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months' post-randomisation. An economic evaluation will be carried out alongside the trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will run parallel to the trial, the protocol for which is reported in a companion paper.

DISCUSSION:

The results of the trial will provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care in terms of improving women's quality of life, and of its cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577 . Registered on June 10, 2017.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article