Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A rapid review of advanced life support guidelines for cardiac arrest associated with anaphylaxis.
McLure, Michael; Eastwood, Kathryn; Parr, Michael; Bray, Janet.
Afiliação
  • McLure M; Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australia.
  • Eastwood K; Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australia.
  • Parr M; Liverpool Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Australia; Macquarie University Hospitals, Intensive Care Unit, Australia; University of New South Wales and Macquarie University, Australia.
  • Bray J; Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australia; Curtin University, Prehospital, Resuscitation and Emergency Care Research Unit, Australia. Electronic address: janet.bray@monash.edu.
Resuscitation ; 159: 137-149, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068641
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We conducted a rapid review of current international and Australian advanced life support (ALS) guidelines for cardiac arrest associated with anaphylaxis to (1) assess the variation and (2) determine if a systematic review update of ALS guideline recommendations is warranted.

METHOD:

A search and comparison of key recommendations was conducted for major international and Australian clinical guidelines, including member societies and councils of the World Allergy Organisation and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). Systematic database searches (Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov databases) was conducted to identify existing and in-progress research published on the topic of anaphylaxis and cardiac arrest.

RESULTS:

Eight international guidelines were identified from Australia/New Zealand, Europe, United States and Canada, and 5 national guidelines were identified for Australia. There was general consensus across all guidelines for the use of adrenaline, oxygen, patient positioning and glucagon. There was variation across international and Australian guidelines for adrenaline dosing and frequency, antihistamines and corticosteroid recommendations. Most recommendations were based on low-level evidence, and the review of published systematic reviews and clinical trials identified new evidence in the last decade.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found significant variation between current ALS guideline recommendations for treating anaphylaxis. While there is no new evidence to suggest a systematic review of guideline recommendations is needed, there may be an opportunity to produce more consistent international guideline recommendations and educational materials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parada Cardíaca / Anafilaxia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parada Cardíaca / Anafilaxia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article