Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of techniques for the selection of bacteria-free sperm preparations.
Sun, L S; Gastaldi, C; Peterson, E M; de la Maza, L M; Stone, S C.
Afiliação
  • Sun LS; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange 92668.
Fertil Steril ; 48(4): 659-63, 1987 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3308520
ABSTRACT
The authors compared the three most commonly used sperm preparation techniques--swim-up, fall-down, and Percoll gradient--for their ability to recover highly motile sperm and minimize bacterial contamination. Eleven human semen samples collected by masturbation were used and run in parallel with the three methods. A semiquantitative bacterial analysis was performed in all samples and results expressed in colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml). The Percoll gradient technique resulted in an average sperm concentration of 5.81 +/- 4.4 X 10(6) ml, and the average bacterial concentration dropped from 8.66 +/- 12.96 X 10(3) CFU/ml in semen to 0.01 +/- 0.03 X 10(3) CFU/ml. The bacterial count was not significantly different when the raw semen was compared with the swim-up or the fall-down preparations. The authors conclude that the Percoll gradient method yields an adequate sperm concentration, with high motility and improved morphology, while eliminating bacterial contamination.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Espermatozoides / Bactérias / Separação Celular Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1987 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Espermatozoides / Bactérias / Separação Celular Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1987 Tipo de documento: Article