Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment.
Medina Perez, Giancarlo; Tran, Megan M; McDonald, Christopher; O'Donnell, Ryan; Cruz, Aristides I.
Afiliação
  • Medina Perez G; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
  • Tran MM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
  • McDonald C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
  • O'Donnell R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
  • Cruz AI; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10505, 2020 Sep 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094047
ABSTRACT
Introduction Midshaft clavicle fractures are a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate between non-surgical and surgical treatment options for certain midshaft clavicle fractures. Due to the lack of a clear treatment strategy, this presents an opportunity for shared decision-making, which has been shown to be important to patients. Methods A 19-question survey was created encompassing basic demographic information, then taking respondents through a simulation of a midshaft clavicle fracture patient encounter. Subjects were subsequently asked their preferred treatment choice as well as shared decision-making preferences for the simulated encounter. A pilot study was performed with medical students from our home institution to assess study sample size. The survey was then distributed through an online software platform (Amazon Mechanical Turk). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA, Microsoft Excel, and Qualtrics. Results 253 subjects responded to the online survey. Over 70% of respondents had no to minimal knowledge of clavicle fractures and potential medical interventions/treatments. 67.6% of respondents preferred shared decision-making, over autonomous or paternalistic models. 45.5% of respondents wanted additional time outside the physician-patient consultation before making a treatment decision. A majority of the respondents who selected surgery (44.3%; 43/97) and no surgery (69.9%; 109/156), based their decisions on outcomes data provided in the simulation alone. There was no statistically significant relationship between income, race/ethnicity, education level, work status, sex, or type of visual fracture representation (i.e., radiograph vs. cartoon image) and treatment decision (p>0.05). Younger age (p=0.007) and being married (p=0.001) were associated with increased likelihood to select surgery as the treatment decision.  Conclusion Most respondents had no-to-minimal knowledge about clavicle fractures, placed a high value in shared decision-making for midshaft clavicle fractures, and prioritized outcomes data in making treatment decisions. Younger age and marital status may increase the likelihood of a patient selecting to proceed with surgery over non-operative treatment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article