Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wound complications and 30-day readmissions after single and bilateral internal mammary grafting: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.
Hirji, Sameer; Shah, Rohan; Shah, Shawn; Okoh, Alexis; Seese, Laura; Yazdchi, Farhang; Aranki, Sary; Shekar, Prem; Kaneko, Tsuyoshi.
Afiliação
  • Hirji S; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shah R; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shah S; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Okoh A; Cardiovascular Research Institute, RWJ Barnabas Health, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Seese L; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Yazdchi F; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Aranki S; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shekar P; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kaneko T; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Card Surg ; 36(1): 74-81, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135295
BACKGROUND: This study compares the postoperative outcomes, 30-day readmission rates, and incidence of sternal wound infection-related readmissions between patients receiving bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) and single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: We utilized the weighted 2013-2014 National Readmission Database claims to identify all US adult patients who underwent CABG utilizing SIMA (n = 279,891) or BIMA (n = 11,651). Thirty-day overall and wound-related readmissions, in-hospital outcomes, costs, lengths of stay (LOS) at readmissions were compared between the two groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: After propensity matching (n = 10,339 pairs), there were no significant differences between the two groups during the index hospitalization, except for higher total hospital costs in the BIMA group (p = .02). The incidence of wound infections was also comparable between BIMA and SIMA (1.1% vs. 1.2%; p = .50). At 30-days, the overall readmission rate was elevated in SIMA patients (9.5% vs. 8.8%; p < .01), primarily impacted by cardiovascular causes. While the proportion of 30-day readmissions due to infections was significantly higher among BIMA versus SIMA patients (20.4% vs. 15.9%; p < .01), wound infections during the index hospitalization did not predict all-cause 30-day readmission among BIMA patients (p = .24) in the risk-adjusted analysis. Among the readmitted patients, LOS (6.4 vs. 6.2 days), costs ($14,440 vs. $16,461), and in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs. 1.7%) were comparable between the two groups (all p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: BIMA grafting is not an independent predictor of all-cause 30-day readmissions. Cardiovascular causes remain the primary driver of 30-day readmissions among SIMA and BIMA patients after CABG.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Artéria Torácica Interna Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Artéria Torácica Interna Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article