Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging and 99mTc-pyrophosphate in cardiac amyloidosis.
Zhang, Li Xin; Martineau, Patrick; Finnerty, Vincent; Giraldeau, Geneviève; Parent, Marie-Claude; Harel, François; Pelletier-Galarneau, Matthieu.
Afiliação
  • Zhang LX; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Martineau P; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Finnerty V; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Giraldeau G; Department of Medicine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Parent MC; Department of Medicine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Harel F; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Pelletier-Galarneau M; Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 29(3): 1132-1140, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146862
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pyrophosphate (PYP) scintigraphy provides high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). There has recently been emerging interest in using 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) for this application, yet its sensitivity has never been directly compared to that of PYP, the current molecular gold standard

METHODS:

Twelve subjects with ATTR-CA and 5 controls referred for PYP-SPECT were prospectively enrolled. 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were performed at 1 and 3 hours. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the images were performed, and the sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT and PYP-SPECT were compared

RESULTS:

Visual interpretation of NaF PET/CT yielded a sensitivity of 0.25 (95% CI 0.089 to 0.53) for the detection of ATTR-CA, which is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT/CT (100%, P = .016). Visual interpretation at 3 hours yielded a similar sensitivity of 0.30 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.60, P = 1.00). There were no false-positive NaF PET studies. Mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmean) at 1h did not differ significantly (P = .21) in ATTR-CA subjects (0.83 ± 0.15) compared to controls (0.72 ± 0.15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69 ± 0.16 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.00, P = .23).

CONCLUSION:

With qualitative and quantitative analyses, sensitivity of NaF PET/CT is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT for the diagnosis of ATTR-CA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoreto de Sódio / Amiloidose Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoreto de Sódio / Amiloidose Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article