Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in Antarctic wildlife.
Barbosa, Andrés; Varsani, Arvind; Morandini, Virginia; Grimaldi, Wray; Vanstreels, Ralph E T; Diaz, Julia I; Boulinier, Thierry; Dewar, Meagan; González-Acuña, Daniel; Gray, Rachael; McMahon, Clive R; Miller, Gary; Power, Michelle; Gamble, Amandine; Wille, Michelle.
Afiliação
  • Barbosa A; Evolutionary Ecology Dpt. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, C/José Gutierrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: barbosa@mncn.csic.es.
  • Varsani A; The Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA; Structural Biology Research Unit, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, South
  • Morandini V; Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Oregon, USA.
  • Grimaldi W; PO Box 231938, Encinitas, CA, USA.
  • Vanstreels RET; Institute of Research and Rehabilitation of Marine Animals (IPRAM), Rodovia, Cariacica, Brazil.
  • Diaz JI; Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE-UNLP-CONICET), La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Boulinier T; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, EPHE, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, IRD, Montpellier, France.
  • Dewar M; School of Science, Psychology and Sport, Federation University Australia, Australia.
  • González-Acuña D; Laboratorio de Parásitos y Enfermedades de Fauna Silvestre, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile.
  • Gray R; Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • McMahon CR; IMOS Animal Satellite Tagging, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Miller G; Discipline of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
  • Power M; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
  • Gamble A; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wille M; Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sci Total Environ ; 755(Pt 2): 143352, 2021 Feb 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33162142
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This pathogen has spread rapidly across the world, causing high numbers of deaths and significant social and economic impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus with a suggested zoonotic origin with the potential for cross-species transmission among animals. Antarctica can be considered the only continent free of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, concerns have been expressed regarding the potential human introduction of this virus to the continent through the activities of research or tourism to minimise the effects on human health, and the potential for virus transmission to Antarctic wildlife. We assess the reverse-zoonotic transmission risk to Antarctic wildlife by considering the available information on host susceptibility, dynamics of the infection in humans, and contact interactions between humans and Antarctic wildlife. The environmental conditions in Antarctica seem to be favourable for the virus stability. Indoor spaces such as those at research stations, research vessels or tourist cruise ships could allow for more transmission among humans and depending on their movements between different locations the virus could be spread across the continent. Among Antarctic wildlife previous in silico analyses suggested that cetaceans are at greater risk of infection whereas seals and birds appear to be at a low infection risk. However, caution needed until further research is carried out and consequently, the precautionary principle should be applied. Field researchers handling animals are identified as the human group posing the highest risk of transmission to animals while tourists and other personnel pose a significant risk only when in close proximity (< 5 m) to Antarctic fauna. We highlight measures to reduce the risk as well as identify of knowledge gaps related to this issue.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zoonoses / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zoonoses / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article