Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic yield and accuracy in a tertiary referral syncope unit validating the ESC guideline on syncope: a prospective cohort study.
de Jong, Jelle S Y; Blok, Minou R Snijders; Thijs, Roland D; Harms, Mark P M; Hemels, Martin E W; de Groot, Joris R; van Dijk, Nynke; de Lange, Frederik J.
Afiliação
  • de Jong JSY; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Blok MRS; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Thijs RD; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.
  • Harms MPM; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland - SEIN, Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, Dokter Denekampweg 20, 8025 BV Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Hemels MEW; Department of Internal and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Groot JR; Department of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • van Dijk N; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • de Lange FJ; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Europace ; 23(5): 797-805, 2021 05 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219671
AIMS: To assess in patients with transient loss of consciousness the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of the structured approach as described in the ESC guidelines in a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective cohort study including 264 consecutive patients (≥18 years) referred with at least one self-reported episode of transient loss of consciousness and presenting to the syncope unit between October 2012 and February 2015. The study consisted of three phases: history taking (Phase 1), autonomic function tests (AFTs) (Phase 2), and after 1.5-year follow-up with assessment by a multidisciplinary committee (Phase 3). Diagnostic yield was assessed after Phases 1 and 2. Empirical diagnostic accuracy was measured for diagnoses according to the ESC guidelines after Phase 3. The diagnostic yield after Phase 1 (history taking) was 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1-97.0%, 250/264 patients) and increased to 97.0% (93.9-98.6%, 256/264 patients) after Phase 2. The overall diagnostic accuracy (as established in Phase 3) of the Phases 1 and 2 diagnoses was 90.6% (95% CI: 86.2-93.8%, 232/256 patients). No life-threatening conditions were missed. Three patients died, two unrelated to the cause of transient loss of consciousness, and one whom remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION: A clinical work-up at a tertiary syncope unit using the ESC guidelines has a high diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety. History taking (Phase 1) is the most important diagnostic tool. Autonomic function tests never changed the Phase 1 diagnosis but helped to increase the certainty of the Phase 1 diagnosis in many patients and yield additional diagnoses in patients who remained undiagnosed after Phase 1. Diagnoses were inaccurate in 9.4%, but no serious conditions were missed. This is adequate for clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síncope / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síncope / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article