Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Cabin of an AW169 Helicopter.
McHenry, Allan S; Curtis, Leigh; Ter Avest, E; Russell, Malcolm Q; Halls, Amy V; Mitchinson, Sophie; Griggs, Joanne E; Lyon, Richard M.
Afiliação
  • McHenry AS; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
  • Curtis L; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
  • Ter Avest E; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK; Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Russell MQ; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
  • Halls AV; University of Southampton, Chilworth, Southampton, UK.
  • Mitchinson S; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
  • Griggs JE; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK. Electronic address: JoG@aakss.org.uk.
  • Lyon RM; Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Redhill, Surrey, UK; University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Air Med J ; 39(6): 468-472, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228896
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Prehospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an important aspect of prehospital care for helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). This study examines the feasibility of in-aircraft (aircraft on the ground) RSI in different simulated settings.

METHODS:

Using an AW169 aircraft cabin simulator at Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, 3 clinical scenarios were devised. All required RSI in a "can intubate, can ventilate" (easy variant) and a "can't intubate, can't ventilate" scenario (difficult variant). Doctor-paramedic HEMS teams were video recorded, and elapsed times for prespecified end points were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) was achieved fastest outside the simulator for the easy variant (median = 231 seconds, interquartile range = 28 seconds). Time to ETI was not significantly longer for in-aircraft RSI compared with RSI outside the aircraft, both in the easy (p = .14) and difficult variant (p = .50). Wearing helmets with noise distraction did not impact the time to intubation when compared with standard in-aircraft RSI, both in the easy (p = .28) and difficult variant (p = .24).

CONCLUSION:

In-aircraft, on-the-ground RSI had no significant impact on the time to successful completion of ETI. Future studies should prospectively examine in-cabin RSI and explore the possibilities of in-flight RSI in civilian HEMS services.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resgate Aéreo / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resgate Aéreo / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article