An unexpected paradox: wall shear stress in the aorta is less in patients with severe atherosclerosis regardless of obesity.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a widespread condition that is more prevalent in Western countries compared to others. Aortic atherosclerosis (AA) is a condition that frequently has been associated with obesity. An obesity paradox, where morbidly obese decedents had either no or minimal AA compared to nonobese decedents, recently has been described by some of us. The explanation for this almost counterintuitive paradox has yet to be determined, but a number of hypotheses were advanced, including hemodynamic factors producing aortic wall shear stress (WSS). The purpose of the present study was to determine if there was a relationship between AA and WSS, as determined by postmortem measurement of aortic wall diameters. METHODS: Circumferences of the aorta at the levels of the ascending, thoracic and abdominal aorta were measured in 274 consecutive autopsies over 2-year period of time. AA was assessed using a previously described grading scale as either mild or severe. Circumferences were mathematically converted to diameters and WSS was calculated using the Hagen-Poiseuille formula. Two different methods to estimate cardiac output were used, both based on literature methods, one of which was body mass index (BMI) dependent, and the other BMI independent. Univariate and multivariable analyses of the relationship between WSS, age, BMI, gender, race and severity of AA were performed. RESULTS: Of the 274 decedents, 140 had mild and 134 had moderate to severe AA. BMI <35 was associated with moderate to severe AA. WSS was inversely correlated with AA in all these segments of the aorta in each BMI subgroup with the exception of the ascending aorta for decedents with BMI ≤35 kg/m2. Contrary to what we had hypothesized, WSS was not a determinant of the obesity paradox. However, among all the variables analyzed, a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and age were significant factors for developing AA (relative risk [RR] 0.35, P = .039; RR 1.51, P = .0006, RR 1.19, P = .0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that WSS was unexpectedly lower in decedents with moderate and severe AA as compared to those with mild AA. This observation, which requires further investigations, was seen in all BMI ranges and was confirmed by 2 methods to calculate WSS.