Spinal cord injury level and Phrenic Nerve Conduction Studies do not predict diaphragm pacing success or failure- all patients should undergo diagnostic laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm Pacing(DP) demonstrates benefits over mechanical ventilation(MV) for spinal cord injured(SCI) patients. The hypothesis of this report is that phrenic nerve conduction study(PNCS) results cannot differentiate success or failure in selection of patients for DP. Direct surgical evaluation of the diaphragm should be performed. METHODS: Observational report of prospective databases of patients undergoing laparoscopic evaluation of their diaphragms to assess for ability to stimulate to cause contraction for ventilation. RESULTS: In 50 SCI patients who could not be weaned from MV, PNCS results showed latencies in stimulated patients (n = 44) and non-stimulated(n = 6) overlapped (7.8 ± 2.5 ms vs 9.4 ± 2.8 ms) and the null hypothesis cannot be rejected (p-value>0.05). Amplitudes overlapped (0.4 ± 0.2 mV vs 0.2 ± 0.2 mV) and the null hypotheses cannot be rejected (P-value >0.05). In 125 non SCI patients with diaphragm paralysis, there were 78(62.4%) with false negative PNCS. CONCLUSION: PNCS are inadequate pre-operative studies. Direct laparoscopic evaluation should be offered for all SCI patients to receive the benefit of DP.