Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nonexercise Interventions for Prevention of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Armed Forces: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Arslan, Ilgin G; Dijksma, Iris; van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S; Lucas, Cees; Stuiver, Martijn M.
Afiliação
  • Arslan IG; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dijksma I; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Defence Healthcare Organisation, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: i.dijksma@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • van Etten-Jamaludin FS; Amsterdam UMC, Research Support, Medical Library AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Lucas C; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Stuiver MM; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Prev Med ; 60(2): e73-e84, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243660
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT This study evaluates the effect of nonexercise interventions on the reduction of risk for musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A database search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, Greylit, Open Grey, the WHO trial registry, and the reference lists of included articles up to July 2019. RCTs and cluster RCTs evaluating nonexercise interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces compared with any other intervention(s) or no intervention were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done by 2 authors independently, followed by meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment, if appropriate. EVIDENCE

SYNTHESIS:

This study included 27 articles with a total number of 25,593 participants, examining nutritional supplementation, prophylactic medication, and equipment modifications with mostly high or unclear risk of bias. Meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment could be performed for 3 comparisons custom-made insoles versus no insoles, tropical/hot-weather boots versus leather boots, and shock-absorbing insoles versus nonshock-absorbing insoles interventions, all showing the very low quality of evidence. Some evidence was found to support the preventive effect of shock-absorbing insoles, basketball shoes, padded polyester socks, calcium with vitamin D supplementation, only calcium supplementation, protein supplementation, and dynamic patellofemoral braces.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although an evidence base for the efficacy of preventive interventions for musculoskeletal injuries in armed forces is weak, there are some indications for the preventive effect of shock-absorbing insoles, basketball shoes, padded polyester socks, supplementation of calcium alone or combined with vitamin D, protein supplementation, and dynamic patellofemoral braces on the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Nutricional / Militares Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Nutricional / Militares Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article