Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lung volume reduction surgery as salvage procedure after previous use of endobronchial valves.
Caviezel, Claudio; Guglielmetti, Laura-Chiara; Ladan, Mateja; Hansen, Henrik Jessen; Perch, Michael; Schneiter, Didier; Weder, Walter; Opitz, Isabelle; Franzen, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Caviezel C; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Guglielmetti LC; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Ladan M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hansen HJ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Perch M; Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Schneiter D; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Weder W; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Opitz I; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Franzen D; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 32(2): 263-269, 2021 01 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280038
OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction (LVR) is an efficient and approved treatment for selected emphysema patients. There is some evidence that repeated LVR surgery (LVRS) might be beneficial, but there are no current data on LVRS after unsuccessful bronchoscopic LVR (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBVs). We hypothesize good outcome of LVRS after BLVR with valves. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively investigated all patients who underwent LVRS between 2015 and 2019 at 2 centres after previous unsuccessful EBV treatment. They were further divided into subgroups with patients who never achieved the intended improvement after BLVR (primary failure) and patients whose benefit was fading over time due to the natural development of emphysema (secondary failure). Patients with severe air leak after BLVR and immediate concomitant LVRS and fistula closure thereafter were analysed separately. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included. Of these, 19 patients had primary failure, 15 secondary failure and 4 were treated as an emergency due to severe air leak. At 3 months after LVRS, forced expiratory volume in 1 s had improved significantly by 12.5% (P = 0.011) and there was no 90-day mortality. Considering subgroups, patients with primary failure after BLVR seem to profit more than those with secondary failure. Patients with severe air leak after BLVR did not profit from fistula closure with concomitant LVRS. CONCLUSIONS: LVRS after previous BLVR with EBVs can provide significant clinical improvement with low morbidity, although results might not be as good as after primary LVRS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonectomia / Enfisema Pulmonar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonectomia / Enfisema Pulmonar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article