Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature.
Leong, Joon Yau; Steward, James E; Healy, Kelly A; Hubosky, Scott G; Bagley, Demetrius H.
Afiliação
  • Leong JY; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Steward JE; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Healy KA; Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Hubosky SG; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bagley DH; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arab J Urol ; 18(4): 241-246, 2020 May 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33312735
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate ureteric stenting practice patterns amongst a range of academic and community urologists, and to examine the nomenclature used to identify an indwelling ureteric stent from both our questionnaire and from a review of the literature. Subjects and

methods:

A 16-question, peer-reviewed online survey was distributed to members of the Mid-Atlantic American Urological Association. Responses were collected over a 1-month period. Questions included demographics, ureteric stenting practice patterns, and utilization of stenting nomenclature. Inappropriate use of nomenclature was defined as a mismatch between the visually depicted stents and the written description amongst urologists. Trends in ureteric stenting and nomenclature usage were tabulated and analyzed.

Results:

Of 863 members, 105 (12.2%) responded to the survey. There was a wide variety of practice settings, with the single-specialty group (44.2%) and academic/university (27.9%) being the two most common. Most providers used both cystoscopy and fluoroscopy to place stents (87.5%) as compared to fluoroscopy alone (12.5%). Most urologists (63.5%) removed stents with cystoscopy as compared to using a stent string (36.5%). While about half (51.0%) of the respondents left stents in situ for ≤3 months, many respondents (43.3%) felt comfortable with maximum dwell times of up to 6 months. The most commonly placed stent was the double pigtail stent (80.8%). However, most respondents inappropriately described this stent design as a Double J stent (72.1%). In the recent literature, 80% of articles clearly defined as using double pigtail stents, incorrectly identified their stent as a 'Double J'.

Conclusions:

Variations in ureteric stenting practice patterns exist amongst community and academic urologists. Although most urologists utilize double pigtail ureteric stents, the majority inaccurately identified this stent design as a Double J. We propose use of the term 'indwelling ureteric stent' (IUS) unless describing any specific stent design.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article