Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remdesivir Use in the Setting of Severe Renal Impairment: A Theoretical Concern or Real Risk?
Pettit, Natasha N; Pisano, Jennifer; Nguyen, Cynthia T; Lew, Alison K; Hazra, Aniruddha; Sherer, Renslow; Mullane, Kathleen M.
Afiliação
  • Pettit NN; Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Pisano J; Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Nguyen CT; Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lew AK; Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Hazra A; Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Sherer R; Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Mullane KM; Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e3990-e3995, 2021 12 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315065
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Remdesivir (RDV) is US FDA approved for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but not recommended in severe renal impairment (SRI, Creatinine clearance <30mL/min or requiring renal replacement therapy). Few studies have evaluated RDV in patients with SRI.

METHODS:

Hospitalized patients who received RDV between 1 May 2020 and 31 October 2020 were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. We compared incident adverse events (AEs) in patients with and without SRI, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, any reported AE, mortality, and length of stay.

RESULTS:

Of a total of 135 patients, 20 had SRI. Patients with SRI were significantly older (70 vs 54 years, P = .0001). The incidence of possible AEs was 30% among those with SRI vs 11% without (P = .06). Liver function test (LFT) elevations occurred in 10% vs 4% (P = .28), and serum creatinine (SCr) elevations in 27% vs 6% (P = .02) of patients with SRI vs without, respectively. LFT and SCr elevations were not attributed to RDV in either group. Mortality and length of stay were consistent with historical controls.

CONCLUSIONS:

RDV AEs occurred infrequently and overall were not significantly different between those with and without SRI. While more of patients with SRI experienced SCr elevations, 3 (75%) patients had acute kidney injury prior to RDV. The use of RDV in this small series of patients with SRI appeared to be relatively safe, and the potential benefit outweighed the theoretical risk of liver or renal toxicity. Additional studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article