Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First Outpatient Evaluation of a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System with Customizable Glucose Targets in Children and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
Forlenza, Gregory P; Buckingham, Bruce A; Brown, Sue A; Bode, Bruce W; Levy, Carol J; Criego, Amy B; Wadwa, R Paul; Cobry, Erin C; Slover, Robert J; Messer, Laurel H; Berget, Cari; McCoy, Susan; Ekhlaspour, Laya; Kingman, Ryan S; Voelmle, Mary K; Boyd, Jennifer; O'Malley, Grenye; Grieme, Aimee; Kivilaid, Kaisa; Kleve, Krista; Dumais, Bonnie; Vienneau, Todd; Huyett, Lauren M; Lee, Joon Bok; O'Connor, Jason; Benjamin, Eric; Ly, Trang T.
Afiliação
  • Forlenza GP; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Buckingham BA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Brown SA; Division of Endocrinology and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Bode BW; Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Levy CJ; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Criego AB; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Park Nicollet Clinic, International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wadwa RP; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Cobry EC; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Slover RJ; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Messer LH; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Berget C; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • McCoy S; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Ekhlaspour L; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Kingman RS; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Voelmle MK; Division of Endocrinology and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Boyd J; Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • O'Malley G; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Grieme A; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Park Nicollet Clinic, International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kivilaid K; Covance, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Kleve K; Covance, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Dumais B; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Vienneau T; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Huyett LM; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lee JB; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • O'Connor J; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Benjamin E; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ly TT; Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 23(6): 410-424, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325779
ABSTRACT

Background:

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the first commercial configuration of a tubeless automated insulin delivery system, Omnipod® 5, in children (6-13.9 years) and adults (14-70 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in an outpatient setting. Materials and

Methods:

This was a single-arm, multicenter, prospective clinical study. Data were collected over a 14-day standard therapy (ST) phase followed by a 14-day hybrid closed-loop (HCL) phase, where participants (n = 36) spent 72 h at each of three prespecified glucose targets (130, 140, and 150 mg/dL, 9 days total) then 5 days with free choice of glucose targets (110-150 mg/dL) using the Omnipod 5. Remote safety monitoring alerts were enabled during the HCL phase. Primary endpoints were difference in time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) between ST and HCL phases and proportion of participants reporting serious device-related adverse events.

Results:

Mean TIR was significantly higher among children in the free-choice period overall (64.9% ± 12.2%, P < 0.01) and when using a 110 mg/dL target (71.2% ± 10.2%, P < 0.01), a 130 mg/dL target (61.5% ± 7.7%, P < 0.01), and a 140 mg/dL target (64.8% ± 11.6%, P < 0.01), and among adults using a 130 mg/dL target (75.1% ± 11.6%, P < 0.05), compared to the ST phase (children 51.0% ± 13.3% and adults 65.6% ± 15.7%). There were no serious device-related adverse events reported during the HCL phase, nor were there episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis.

Conclusion:

The Omnipod 5 System was safe and effective when used at glucose targets from 110 to 150 mg/dL for 14 days at home in children and adults with T1D.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article