Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of automated planning for whole-brain radiation therapy using deep learning.
Yu, Jesang; Goh, Youngmoon; Song, Kye Jin; Kwak, Jungwon; Cho, Byungchul; Kim, Su San; Lee, Sang-Wook; Choi, Eun Kyung.
Afiliação
  • Yu J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Goh Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Song KJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kwak J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SW; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi EK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(1): 184-190, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340391
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to develop automated planning for whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) using a U-net-based deep-learning model for predicting the multileaf collimator (MLC) shape bypassing the contouring processes.

METHODS:

A dataset of 55 cases, including 40 training sets, five validation sets, and 10 test sets, was used to predict the static MLC shape. The digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) reconstructed from planning CT images as an input layer and the MLC shape as an output layer are connected one-to-one via the U-net modeling. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as the loss function in the training and ninefold cross-validation. Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) curves were constructed for assessing the automatic MLC shaping performance. Deep-learning (DL) and manually optimized (MO) approaches were compared based on the DVH curves and dose distributions.

RESULTS:

The ninefold cross-validation ensemble test results were consistent with DSC values of 94.6 ± 0.4 and 94.7 ± 0.9 in training and validation learnings, respectively. The dose coverages of 95% target volume were (98.0 ± 0.7)% and (98.3 ± 0.8)%, and the maximum doses for the lens as critical organ-at-risk were 2.9 Gy and 3.9 Gy for DL and MO, respectively. The DL technique shows the consistent results in terms of the DVH parameter except for MLC shaping prediction for dose saving of small organs such as lens.

CONCLUSIONS:

Comparable with the MO plan result, the WBRT plan quality obtained using the DL approach is clinically acceptable. Moreover, the DL approach enables WBRT auto-planning without the time-consuming manual MLC shaping and target contouring.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article