Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.
Teles, Gustavo Borges da Silva; Macedo, Ana Carolina Sandoval; Chate, Rodrigo Caruso; Valente, Viviane Arevalo Tabone; Funari, Marcelo Buarque de Gusmao; Szarf, Gilberto.
Afiliação
  • Teles GBDS; Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil gustavo.teles@einstein.br.
  • Macedo ACS; Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Chate RC; Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Valente VAT; Preventive Health Center, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Funari MBG; Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Szarf G; Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 7(1)2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371010
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The improvement of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening selection criteria could help to include more individuals who have lung cancer, or in whom lung cancer will develop, while avoiding significant cost increase. We evaluated baseline results of LDCT lung cancer screening in a population with a heterogeneous risk profile for lung cancer.

METHODS:

LDCT lung cancer screening was implemented alongside a preventive health programme in a private hospital in Brazil. Individuals older than 45 years, smokers and former smokers, regardless of tobacco exposure, were included. Patients were classified according to the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) eligibility criteria and to PLCOm2012 6-year lung cancer risk. Patient characteristics, CT positivity rate, detection rate of lung cancer and false-positive rate were assessed.

RESULTS:

LDCT scans of 472 patients were evaluated and three lung adenocarcinomas were diagnosed. CT positivity rate (Lung-RADS 3/4) was significantly higher (p=0.019) in the NLST group (10.1% (95% CI, 5.9% to 16.9%)) than in the non-NLST group (3.6% (95% CI, 2.62% to 4.83%)) and in the PLCOm2012 high-risk group (14.3% (95% CI, 6.8% to 27.7%)) than in the PLCOm2012 low-risk group (3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.8%)) (p=0.016). Detection rate of lung cancer was also significantly higher (p=0.018) among PLCOm2012 high-risk patients (5.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 12.6%)) than in the PLCOm2012 low-risk individuals (0.2% (95% CI, 0.1% to 1.1%)). The false-positive rate for NLST criteria (16.4% (95% CI, 13.2% to 20.1%)) was higher (p<0.001) than for PLCOm2012 criteria (7.6 (95% CI, 5.3% to 10.5%)).

DISCUSSION:

Our study indicates a lower performance when screening low-risk individuals in comparison to screening patients meeting NLST criteria and PLCOm2012 high-risk patients. Also, incorporating PLCOm2012 6-year lung cancer risk ≥0.0151 as an eligibility criterion seems to increase lung cancer screening effectiveness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article