Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The optimal cut-off values for tumor size, number of lesions, and CEA levels in patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer liver metastases: An international, multi-institutional study.
Kamphues, Carsten; Andreatos, Nikolaos; Kruppa, Jochen; Buettner, Stefan; Wang, Jaeyun; Sasaki, Kazunari; Wagner, Doris; Morioka, Daisuke; Fitschek, Fabian; Løes, Inger Marie; Imai, Katsunori; Sun, Jinger; Poultsides, George; Kaczirek, Klaus; Lønning, Per Eystein; Endo, Itaru; Baba, Hideo; Kornprat, Peter; Aucejo, Federico N; Wolfgang, Christopher L; Kreis, Martin E; Weiss, Matthew J; Margonis, Georgios Antonios.
Afiliação
  • Kamphues C; Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité, University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Andreatos N; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Kruppa J; Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité, University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Buettner S; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Wang J; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Sasaki K; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Wagner D; Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Morioka D; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Fitschek F; Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Løes IM; Department of Clinical Science and Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Imai K; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Sun J; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Poultsides G; Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Kaczirek K; Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Lønning PE; Department of Clinical Science and Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Endo I; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Baba H; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Kornprat P; Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Aucejo FN; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Wolfgang CL; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Kreis ME; Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Charité, University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Weiss MJ; Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York, USA.
  • Margonis GA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(4): 939-948, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400818
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Despite the long-standing consensus on the importance of tumor size, tumor number and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels as predictors of long-term outcomes among patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), optimal prognostic cut-offs for these variables have not been established.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of CRLM and had available data on at least one of the three variables of interest above were selected from a multi-institutional dataset of patients with known KRAS mutational status. The resulting cohort was randomly split into training and testing datasets and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-offs. The concordance probability estimates (CPEs) for these optimal cut offs were calculated and compared to CPEs for the most widely used cut-offs in the surgical literature.

RESULTS:

A total of 1643 patients who met eligibility criteria were identified. Following recursive partitioning analysis in the training dataset, the following cut-offs were identified 2.95 cm for tumor size, 1.5 for tumor number and 6.15 ng/ml for CEA levels. In the entire dataset, the calculated CPEs for the new tumor size (0.52), tumor number (0.56) and CEA (0.53) cut offs exceeded CPEs for other commonly employed cut-offs.

CONCLUSION:

The current study was able to identify optimal cut-offs for the three most commonly employed prognostic factors in CRLM. While the per variable gains in discriminatory power are modest, these novel cut-offs may help produce appreciable increases in prognostic performance when combined in the context of future risk scores.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Antígeno Carcinoembrionário / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Antígeno Carcinoembrionário / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article