Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of Osteolysis and Aseptic Loosening Following Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Studies with Up to 15-Year Follow-up.
Prock-Gibbs, Hannah; Pumilia, Cyrus Anthony; Meckmongkol, Teerin; Lovejoy, John; Mumith, Aadil; Coathup, Melanie.
Afiliação
  • Prock-Gibbs H; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Pumilia CA; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Meckmongkol T; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Lovejoy J; Departments of General Surgery (T.M.) and Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.L.), Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
  • Mumith A; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Coathup M; Departments of General Surgery (T.M.) and Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.L.), Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(8): 728-740, 2021 04 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411465
BACKGROUND: This study compared the incidence of osteolysis, aseptic loosening, and revision following use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) or conventional polyethylene (CPE) at medium to long-term (>5 to 15 years) follow-up in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Incidences were quantified and compared with regard to age and method of implant fixation. METHODS: Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 12 randomized controlled trials and 18 cohort studies were investigated for evidence-based outcomes following HXPLE and CPE use in 2,539 hips over a 5 to 15-year follow-up. RESULTS: Lower rates of osteolysis, aseptic loosening, and implant revision were reported following use of HXLPE liners. Osteolysis was reduced from 25.4% with CPE to 4.05% with HXLPE in young patients, and from 29.7% to 6.6% in the older patient cohort. Similarities in osteolysis rates were observed when cemented (24.9% for CPE and 6.5% for HXLPE) and uncemented components (32.8% for CPE and 7.1% for HXLPE) were compared. No clear advantage in the type of HXLPE used was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Over a follow-up period of up to 15 years, when compared with CPE, use of HXLPE liners reduced the incidence of osteolysis, aseptic loosening, and implant revision, regardless of the fixation method and including in younger and potentially more active patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteólise / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Polietileno / Prótese de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteólise / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Polietileno / Prótese de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article