Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying barriers and considerations for cochlear implantation in Amish children.
Whelan, Rachel; McCoy, Jennifer L; Omar, Mahmoud; Chi, David H.
Afiliação
  • Whelan R; UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Otolaryngology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: rlwhelan15@gmail.com.
  • McCoy JL; UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Otolaryngology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
  • Omar M; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
  • Chi DH; UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Otolaryngology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(2): 102887, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422945
OBJECTIVE: To determine if barriers to cochlear implantation (CI) exist with respect to Amish children and to describe unique considerations associated with CI and subsequent otologic care in the Amish population. METHODS: Out of all patients who underwent CI at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2008 to 2019, Amish children were age-matched to the remainder of the cohort to compare demographics and care-related metrics including etiology of hearing loss, age at time of initial hearing-related appointment and at CI, total number of pre- and post-operative audiologic and otologic appointments, and post-operative complications. Social considerations that may pose barriers to care were collected for descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Since 2008, 232 children underwent CI, of which 8 implants were performed on Amish children. Six (75%) Amish children underwent newborn hearing screening and 3(38%) were found to have syndromic etiology for hearing loss. While Amish patients had a lower number of both audiologic (15 vs 33.5, p<.001) and otologic (4.5 vs 8.5, p=.028) appointments when compared to age-matched controls, median age at the time of implantation for the whole sample was not different between groups (2.5 vs 2.0 years, p=.211). From a social standpoint, limitations in transportation, telephone communication, and ability to recharge processor batteries must be considered in the Amish population. CONCLUSION: Amish children undergoing CI face unique barriers to care including transportation and technologic limitations, leading to overall fewer hearing-related appointments when compared to an age-matched cohort. Understanding societal differences is important to facilitate optimal care for Amish children with hearing loss.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implante Coclear / Amish / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implante Coclear / Amish / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article